satishku_2000
08-17 04:04 PM
Has any one ever heard of 140 denial due to less percentage of marks secured in graduation.
Job desc is the key, Hope you are talking about a hypothetical scenario. if you are talking about a real scenario you need to take a look at job requirements and desc. If the case is a substituition case then proof of burden is on employer. I think if we are talking about a real scenario then one should get an RFE before a denial.
Job desc is the key, Hope you are talking about a hypothetical scenario. if you are talking about a real scenario you need to take a look at job requirements and desc. If the case is a substituition case then proof of burden is on employer. I think if we are talking about a real scenario then one should get an RFE before a denial.
wallpaper During the gold rush
msyedy
02-06 12:14 PM
Hi All,
I have received a information regarding my EB2 (PD Jan 15 2005)Approval from my old company( Here all the fees are being met by me).I had left that company last year trying to pursue my carrier.
New company has given me an approved labour for EB3 OCt 2004 and I140 is approved.
I would like to know from experinced guys , as to what should I be doing, should I resign from new company and join back the old one?
As GC is for future employment, can i apply for I140 throgh my old company and join them back in I485 Stage?
When can we expect EB2 PD of Jan 2005 to be current.
I would appreciate your responses.
Thanks
Sreedhar
Do not expect anything, no one can tell you a specific range of dates when the priority of a Labor be current. You can join the old emp and use this priority date from the current emp of Oct 2004 to the one with PD Jan 15th 2005.
The priority date is based on a person so you can carry it anywhere only after a I-140 is approved for that labor.
So -- You at the old company can have priority date of Oct 2004.
Yes you can join the old employer when you anytime, even at the time of fillinng your I-485
I have received a information regarding my EB2 (PD Jan 15 2005)Approval from my old company( Here all the fees are being met by me).I had left that company last year trying to pursue my carrier.
New company has given me an approved labour for EB3 OCt 2004 and I140 is approved.
I would like to know from experinced guys , as to what should I be doing, should I resign from new company and join back the old one?
As GC is for future employment, can i apply for I140 throgh my old company and join them back in I485 Stage?
When can we expect EB2 PD of Jan 2005 to be current.
I would appreciate your responses.
Thanks
Sreedhar
Do not expect anything, no one can tell you a specific range of dates when the priority of a Labor be current. You can join the old emp and use this priority date from the current emp of Oct 2004 to the one with PD Jan 15th 2005.
The priority date is based on a person so you can carry it anywhere only after a I-140 is approved for that labor.
So -- You at the old company can have priority date of Oct 2004.
Yes you can join the old employer when you anytime, even at the time of fillinng your I-485
NKR
10-21 08:32 PM
With the risk of this news being branded too India specific, i am posting this...
go to
http://www.isro.org/pslv-c11/videos/introduction.htm for live webcast of chandrayaan launch. the launch is scheduled to be at 8.50 PM ET
go to
http://www.isro.org/pslv-c11/videos/introduction.htm for live webcast of chandrayaan launch. the launch is scheduled to be at 8.50 PM ET
2011 A party of gold miners near
eb3retro
09-24 08:40 AM
first thing first update your profile.
Hi Experts,
On July 8th I filed my EAD. I never got any Finger Print Appointment from USCIS. I have been constantly trying to reach them about my FP appointment. But, on Sep 20TH I got a notice saying my petition has been denied because I have not appeared for my FP on Aug 3rd.
They asked me to file a motion, my confusion is should I file a motion or should I reapply. Which one makes it easy and fast to get my EAD ASAP.
Thanks,
--Bala
Hi Experts,
On July 8th I filed my EAD. I never got any Finger Print Appointment from USCIS. I have been constantly trying to reach them about my FP appointment. But, on Sep 20TH I got a notice saying my petition has been denied because I have not appeared for my FP on Aug 3rd.
They asked me to file a motion, my confusion is should I file a motion or should I reapply. Which one makes it easy and fast to get my EAD ASAP.
Thanks,
--Bala
more...
satishku_2000
08-17 03:57 PM
Don't tell me you got one for this!
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4478&page=19
There is a possibility in cases of where job requires minimum GPA . 140 adjudicator can always ask petitioner that the benificiary meets all the requirements for the position offered. In substitution cases there is always a possibility of things getting verified in a microscope.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4478&page=19
There is a possibility in cases of where job requires minimum GPA . 140 adjudicator can always ask petitioner that the benificiary meets all the requirements for the position offered. In substitution cases there is always a possibility of things getting verified in a microscope.
babuworld
01-01 06:49 PM
Hi Team
Listen to this clip in this.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6705905&ft=1&f=1001
Thanks,
babuworld
Listen to this clip in this.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6705905&ft=1&f=1001
Thanks,
babuworld
more...
sr1973
07-23 12:22 AM
I just created this thread but unable to see in the main page. If anyone seeing this thread, please post.
2010 Gold Rush $$$
uma001
11-18 10:31 AM
That's a good sign for folks who wants to file green card next year and could not file this year becos of bad labor market
The most recent update from the USCIS is showing again a steady approval rate. The jump we saw in October was just due to a more current update of the approval, nit an increase in filing according to the USCIS. If this pace will continue we will see visas all through early 2010, but I may be wrong here...
Ao here is is the update from USCIS: As of November 6, 2009, approximately 54,700 H-1B (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) cap-subject petitions had been filed. USCIS has approved sufficient H1-B petitions for aliens with advanced degrees to meet the exemption of 20,000 from the fiscal year 2010 cap. Any H1-B petitions filed on behalf of an alien with an advanced degree will now count toward the general H1-B cap of 65,000. USCIS will continue to accept both cap-subject petitions and advanced degree petitions until a sufficient number of H-1B petitions have been received to reach the statutory limits, taking into account the fact that some of these petitions may be denied, revoked, or withdrawn.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/h1b_visa_cap_update_november_1.html)
The most recent update from the USCIS is showing again a steady approval rate. The jump we saw in October was just due to a more current update of the approval, nit an increase in filing according to the USCIS. If this pace will continue we will see visas all through early 2010, but I may be wrong here...
Ao here is is the update from USCIS: As of November 6, 2009, approximately 54,700 H-1B (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) cap-subject petitions had been filed. USCIS has approved sufficient H1-B petitions for aliens with advanced degrees to meet the exemption of 20,000 from the fiscal year 2010 cap. Any H1-B petitions filed on behalf of an alien with an advanced degree will now count toward the general H1-B cap of 65,000. USCIS will continue to accept both cap-subject petitions and advanced degree petitions until a sufficient number of H-1B petitions have been received to reach the statutory limits, taking into account the fact that some of these petitions may be denied, revoked, or withdrawn.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/h1b_visa_cap_update_november_1.html)
more...
pd052009
11-18 07:08 AM
FI...I got my DL yesterday, 40 days after giving DMV tests.
hair Yesterday a mining company
nomi
04-18 09:02 PM
Please select any of one from following options that fits your situation
more...
indianabacklog
03-27 04:21 PM
It is legal to be paid for taking part in a clinical research study if you are on an H1B. The institution will provide you with a 1099 at the end of the year which you file with your tax return and of course declare the income.
In answer to the second posting not all research is experimental so the risks can be minimal if almost non existent and a very easy way to get a bit extra cash.
In answer to the second posting not all research is experimental so the risks can be minimal if almost non existent and a very easy way to get a bit extra cash.
hot The Gold Rush! miner.jpg
dixie
10-03 12:51 PM
I think we must also emphasise the point that all of us have to pass strict labor market tests supervised by DOL to be even eligible for green cards (and many of us have already passed that). That will blunt the rhetoric from the anti-immigrants and their attempts to obfuscate our issue with the illegal aliens. The tend to make americans believe that applying for a green card is just like applying for a drivers license and just about anyone is eligible.
The only other thing I think should be stressed is that we are already H1-b holders, already applied for green cards, so not taking any more jobs away from USCs. All we are asking for is expedited processing of our already filed applications.
Then Numbersusa or other anti-immigration groups have no points to raise against us
The only other thing I think should be stressed is that we are already H1-b holders, already applied for green cards, so not taking any more jobs away from USCs. All we are asking for is expedited processing of our already filed applications.
Then Numbersusa or other anti-immigration groups have no points to raise against us
more...
house The Klondike Gold Rush (1896)
ssksubash
08-14 10:12 AM
HI,
I received a 500$ check for apartment referral , I am planning to give the entire amount to the person who took the apartment. I was wondering if during the tax return filing I should be reporting this as an income and if yes should I be deducting the tax amount from the 500$ as I will be paying taxes on it.
Any information is appreciated.
Thanks,
I received a 500$ check for apartment referral , I am planning to give the entire amount to the person who took the apartment. I was wondering if during the tax return filing I should be reporting this as an income and if yes should I be deducting the tax amount from the 500$ as I will be paying taxes on it.
Any information is appreciated.
Thanks,
tattoo Working river gravels near
niklshah
09-07 12:12 PM
see you at dc...
more...
pictures the Klondike Gold Rush
makemygc
07-26 11:16 AM
this is a little bit off topic, but does anyway know what are the requirements for practicing immigration law in the US? What kind of formal training and bar exam passing etc are needed?
With the extensive practice that USCIS has provided us, atleast in EB matters I think for most of us it will be a cakewalk. Having gone through the process ourselves we also understand how to treat the immigrant (frequent updates, clear answers, be accessible, provide all options and information) and some of us could make very good immi lawyers (once we get our EADs).
My friends recommending me that too. I should do law instead of doing MBA. Not a bad idea.;)
With the extensive practice that USCIS has provided us, atleast in EB matters I think for most of us it will be a cakewalk. Having gone through the process ourselves we also understand how to treat the immigrant (frequent updates, clear answers, be accessible, provide all options and information) and some of us could make very good immi lawyers (once we get our EADs).
My friends recommending me that too. I should do law instead of doing MBA. Not a bad idea.;)
dresses mini rush when he later
Blog Feeds
12-13 11:20 PM
Immigration Lawyers Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
The January 2011 Visa Bulletin shows significant retrogression of family-based categories with priority dates falling back as much as one to three years. The 1st preference category (unmarried children of U.S. citizens) shows an increased wait from 5 years to 6 years. The 2A preference category (spouses and children of legal permanent residents) suffers the largest setback with an increase from 4 months to 3 years, while the 2B preference category (unmarried adult children of legal permanent residents) experiences an increase from 5 1/2 to 8 years. The 3rd preference category (married children of U.S. citizens) shows an increase from 8 1/2 years to 10 years. The 4th preference category (brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens) was the only family-based category unaffected by the retrogression, remaining at a 9 year wait.
Employment-based categories did not experience any retrogression and are as follows: EB-1 remains current for all countries; EB-2 remains current, except for India (May 2006) and China (June 2006); EB-3 is at Mar. 2005 for all countries, except for India (Feb. 2002), China (Dec. 2003), and Mexico (April 2003); EB-3 other workers is at April 2003 for all countries, except India (Feb. 2002); EB-4, religious workers, EB-5, and targeted employment areas and regional centers are all current.
To view the January 2011 visa bulletin, see http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5212.html
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/MqJ3r3NtuVk
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/MqJ3r3NtuVk/january_2011_visa_bulletin_shows_major_retrogressi on_in_family-based_categories.html)
The January 2011 Visa Bulletin shows significant retrogression of family-based categories with priority dates falling back as much as one to three years. The 1st preference category (unmarried children of U.S. citizens) shows an increased wait from 5 years to 6 years. The 2A preference category (spouses and children of legal permanent residents) suffers the largest setback with an increase from 4 months to 3 years, while the 2B preference category (unmarried adult children of legal permanent residents) experiences an increase from 5 1/2 to 8 years. The 3rd preference category (married children of U.S. citizens) shows an increase from 8 1/2 years to 10 years. The 4th preference category (brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens) was the only family-based category unaffected by the retrogression, remaining at a 9 year wait.
Employment-based categories did not experience any retrogression and are as follows: EB-1 remains current for all countries; EB-2 remains current, except for India (May 2006) and China (June 2006); EB-3 is at Mar. 2005 for all countries, except for India (Feb. 2002), China (Dec. 2003), and Mexico (April 2003); EB-3 other workers is at April 2003 for all countries, except India (Feb. 2002); EB-4, religious workers, EB-5, and targeted employment areas and regional centers are all current.
To view the January 2011 visa bulletin, see http://travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5212.html
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~4/MqJ3r3NtuVk
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ImmigrationLawyersBlog/~3/MqJ3r3NtuVk/january_2011_visa_bulletin_shows_major_retrogressi on_in_family-based_categories.html)
more...
makeup Mining devastated California#39;s
number30
06-09 06:45 AM
My question is regarding Citizenship. My mother married my step father in the year 2000. They have 2 children one is 7 the other is 9. My mother did not adjust her status right after they married. she waited a few years. She received her green card on November of 2006. "the one that renews every 10 years. This year she separated him because she cheated on her. They are not legally separated or anything like that. She wants to become a US Citizen but we think it might be a problem since this year they did not file taxes together. When she did her taxes she checked the box that says shes filing married but separately. He does not want the divorce but she does. I told her she should hold of on any divorce and see about getting her citizenship first. What complications can she have since this year they did not file jointly. I appreciate your time and any input
No she should not have any problems since she has 10 year validity green card(One with Condition removed). IF the citizenship is applied after three years green card they will check the validity of the marriage. Usually if you apply citizenship after 5 years there are will not be questions about marriage. if you have the issues apply 2011
No she should not have any problems since she has 10 year validity green card(One with Condition removed). IF the citizenship is applied after three years green card they will check the validity of the marriage. Usually if you apply citizenship after 5 years there are will not be questions about marriage. if you have the issues apply 2011
girlfriend Return to Gold Rush Images
wellwishergc
02-27 12:51 PM
I think these bills are too complicated and have possibilities of failing on the house floor, even if they pass through the senate..
My question to the group is: Does it make sense for us to lobby for changes to existing laws as 'amendments/enhancements' (do not know the exact term), which need not go through this full-blown congressional approval process.. Another issue that we are facing with the bills such as immig. comprehensive bill is that we get tagged together with illegal immig., so it becomes all the more probable to get rejected. I am just being realistic and urging the IV team to add one more action item to the agenda and see if we can put some efforts towards this additional agenda.
I think, in addition to supporting the bills, we should look at this additional possibility. Something like allowing I-485 even though the number is not available, just requires an amendment to the existing law. It does not require additional quota, so there is no major impact to immigration law as a whole. So, we may not need to wait for a bill to clear, in order for such reliefs to be approved.
My take is: we should strive for 3-pronged approach - 1) near short term approach is to ask for immediate relief such as I-485 filing without the visa number availability; there may be other such reliefs possible - 2) short term approach is to support the current bills being considerd, as we are doing already - 3) long term approach is to think of what is the backup plan in case 1 and 2 fails
Just thinking out loud here.
My question to the group is: Does it make sense for us to lobby for changes to existing laws as 'amendments/enhancements' (do not know the exact term), which need not go through this full-blown congressional approval process.. Another issue that we are facing with the bills such as immig. comprehensive bill is that we get tagged together with illegal immig., so it becomes all the more probable to get rejected. I am just being realistic and urging the IV team to add one more action item to the agenda and see if we can put some efforts towards this additional agenda.
I think, in addition to supporting the bills, we should look at this additional possibility. Something like allowing I-485 even though the number is not available, just requires an amendment to the existing law. It does not require additional quota, so there is no major impact to immigration law as a whole. So, we may not need to wait for a bill to clear, in order for such reliefs to be approved.
My take is: we should strive for 3-pronged approach - 1) near short term approach is to ask for immediate relief such as I-485 filing without the visa number availability; there may be other such reliefs possible - 2) short term approach is to support the current bills being considerd, as we are doing already - 3) long term approach is to think of what is the backup plan in case 1 and 2 fails
Just thinking out loud here.
hairstyles Coloma Gold Rush Live! is
ursosweet
07-17 08:21 PM
again with Company B and file a new 140 and then use the PD of previous labor to file the 485 etc etc.
hope this helps
hope this helps
svam77
07-24 02:17 PM
Hi,
MY labor says that the candidate needs atleast 1 year exp as a Software Engineer.
But my experience letter says that I have 2 years of experience as a Senior Software Engineer.
Would that be ok ? (Actually I was a software engg before and got promoted to Senior Software Eng later.)
I mean should be only Software engr in the exp letter rather than Sr Software engr ?
MY labor says that the candidate needs atleast 1 year exp as a Software Engineer.
But my experience letter says that I have 2 years of experience as a Senior Software Engineer.
Would that be ok ? (Actually I was a software engg before and got promoted to Senior Software Eng later.)
I mean should be only Software engr in the exp letter rather than Sr Software engr ?
prav27
08-27 11:49 AM
I just got off the phone with a second level rep at USCIS and am getting really confused with their mixed messaged. before i push any panic buttons can some one please let me know if they had any conversations with the idiotic bunch at uscis and share your conversations with regards to the visa availability for next month. this idiot states that vsc just oversubscribed and that it could be that there wont be any movement on the cases. all this over enthusiasm for nothing - that would really infuriate me. there is a limit to the fuss they can cause and play with emotions.
Did he say vsc(vermont service center) ?
is vsc still processing 485 cases?
Did he say vsc(vermont service center) ?
is vsc still processing 485 cases?
No comments:
Post a Comment